Why buy this gun? If u wanna go to electro, just buy a gun with anti-chop and 5 firing modes instead of 3. I would have to suggest a spider of this because they are in the ballpark range but twice as good. If ur a paintburner dont get this gun. It shoots slower then expected. I wish Akarion would start making good guns instead of trying to be cool. Dont buy this gun to look cool, beacause it would do the opposite to u.
Not a good electro, just get another electro with better stuff for not much more.
Ok, so the sight rail is stupid. If your smart then you can spend 2 minutes and take of the thing. Its ugly- Wtf who cares its a paintball gun. Its slow- so what, unless your playing speedball, or you suck at paintball you dont need to shoot that fast when your playing out in the woods. Also a gun that has 5 firing modes and anti chop costs $100 more. And you dont need an anti chop bolt if the gun doesnt shoot that fast and you have an electro hopper ( ive never broke a ball with my toro). Not a good electro- mabye but its a good gun.
And by the way owning an imagine like the other half million people who bought their guns at wal-mart makes you reeeal cool...whatever.
Last edited on Tuesday, March 29th, 2005 at 6:40 pm PST
I dont know what your talking about. Ariakon makes exceptional products.
Look at Low End Mech Markers and search by average rating. There are 3-4 Ariakons on the same page. Only noobs need to shoot that fast, one shot one kill.
Imagines are sooo attractive.......thats why you and another million people bought them, for looks not quality.
What's with the SIGHT RAIL? Every Spyder I have ever seen has a sight rail. You know, that funny lookin' thing behind the vertical feed.
Now, other than learning things like grammar and spelling, you might want to learn how to aim, I noticed you mentioned nothing about the gun's accuracy, just that it was "slow". How slow? How many bps did you average? How many chopped balls? Was it efficient?
C'mon, you've been playing for over 5 years and all you can come up with is ugly, slow, and "sight rail"? Besides, how did your Spyder shoot out of the box? Maybe it's some paint-beast now that you have sunk a few hundred bucks into it, but was it any better than the Toro out of the box?
I cannot say the disputes are any good as they give little information as to why the review is disputed. But yeah, this review in its entirety stinks.
Gives little, or from my perspective, no insight as to why this he/she thinks the guns is "terrible".
I hope nobody finds this review remotely helpful.