Join  |  Log In - Paintball Reviews and Paintball Fields


Home     |      Paintball Articles     |      Paintball Videos     |     Paintball Gear     |     Paintball Fields     |     Paintball Stores     |     Hot Deals     |     Paintball Forums     |     Chat / Comments on avm617's Review / Comments on avm617's Review / Comments on avm617's Review / Comments on avm617's Review

Comments on avm617's Review

Jump to the Comments  |  Post a Comment  |  Dispute this Review  |  Return to the Reviews

avm617 Sunday, March 27th, 2005
The accuracy of this review is disputed. Please see discussion below.
Period of
Product Use:
6 months0 of 1 people found this review helpful.

1 year
Products Used:
super swirls, almost every brass eagle paintball, and a couple others
Marker Setup: WGP Outkast Autococker (graphite matte)
WGP torpedo drop forward
Steel Back Freak Barrel (16 inches)

Spyder Xtra
dead on paintball drop foward with on/off
200 rd loader
Pure Energy 88cu/4500 psi tank
16 inch Freak barrel
lapco feedneck w/ no holes in ears

a barrel w/ a changealbe bor size or a bor size from .687 to .685 (works best w/ me)
Strengths: Round
hard but brittle enough to break on target
bright fill (yellow)
cheap $40=2000pbs
Weaknesses: Some have dimples
soft if not used for a while
fill isn't thick
Review: I play woods ball and I have used these for a little bit now and i do like them a lot and so do the people i play w/. We use them because they have a bright fill (yellow or pink). however they the fill is not thick at all. it is no big deal but i noticed one of my friends wiping a hit off when he was in the middle of a fire fight and because of that he won. they are hard unless exposed to moisture. my cocker is under 300 fps its about 290 fps and i shot a hole through a plastic container at about 8 feet away then with the second shot i blew the container in half. i use a bor size of .687 which is maybe a little to big however .685 is a little to small depending on the ball. they are accurate (if matched to barrel correctly) and 99.9 percent of the time break on target. i suggest using a motorized hopper because for some reason they don't always feed out of my regular hopper and this is the only paintball that this has ever happened to not feed steadily.
Conclusion: I do recommend it but basically just for recreational play because of the fill not being thick and they are pretty cheap so give them a try i don't think that u will be disappointed.
9 out of 10

Review Comments
corona Monday, May 8th, 2006 | 8:27 pm PST
The fill in these paintballs are very thick. He said they are not.

NinjaDragon23 Sunday, January 28th, 2007 | 3:35 pm PST
Originally posted by corona
The fill in these paintballs are very thick. He said they are not.
i agree the pball's fill is decently thick

Post a Comment
Please log in to your account to post a comment.

Not a member yet? Sign up now for free!

Return to the Reviews

Help / FAQ  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Advertising Info  |  Link to Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use

Paintball Review

Copyright © 2000-2015 Hillclimb Media