|
|
Period of
Product Use: |
| 3 months | 7 of 7 people found this review helpful.
|
|
|
Paintball
Experience: |
1 year |
|
Similar
Products Used: |
-SP Linear 14 In. Ok, not as good as the AIM
-SP Progressive. Does not compare to AIM
-CMI Thunderpig. Worst barrel I've used (other than stock)
-Stock barrels (around 3-4 different ones) |
|
| Marker Setup: |
-Spyder Sonix '06
-AIM 4 Pc. barrel kit
-Warrior paintball clamping feedneck
-20 OZ CO2 |
|
Recommended
Paintballs: |
Depends on the back, Zap works well for my .687 bore size (extremely well) |
|
|
|
|
| Strengths: |
-Accurate
-Quiet
-Looks
-Price
-Weight |
|
| Weaknesses: |
-None whatsoever |
|
| Review: |
I've used several barrels, and thought I should quit borrowing my friends Progressive. I was about to get a Ceramic, but this was $3 less and was a kit, so I got this instead. Got it home, was surprised at how light it was in for a 4 Pc. kit. It also looked very good on my Sonix. Hooked up my CO2 and tested the 12 In. first, it was pretty accurate, not as good as the 14 that I tried right after, but still pretty good (good for front players). I hit a tree from around 150 Ft. away twice within three inches of each other. In the first game I used it in, I was amazed by the superior accuracy of this compared to my friend's Linear.
EDIT:
I recently got some Zap Spank, which are a bit higher quality than what I was using. This barrel is still good if not better than I thought. This barrel continues to surprise me. |
|
| Conclusion: |
For under $50 this is the best barrel I know of. If you can find it, try it out. |
|
| Rating: |
| 10 out of 10 | Last edited on Friday, November 3rd, 2006 at 7:02 pm PST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
