paintball

  Join pbreview.com  |  Log In  
pbReview.com - Paintball Reviews and Paintball Fields

Search:

  
Home     |      Paintball Articles     |      Paintball Videos     |     Paintball Gear     |     Paintball Fields     |     Paintball Stores     |     Hot Deals     |     Paintball Forums     |     Chat
pbReview.com / Comments on coltlacrosse's Review / Comments on coltlacrosse's Review / Comments on coltlacrosse's Review / Comments on coltlacrosse's Review

Comments on coltlacrosse's Review

Jump to the Comments  |  Post a Comment  |  Dispute this Review  |  Return to the Reviews

coltlacrosse Tuesday, December 19th, 2006
The accuracy of this review is disputed. Please see discussion below.
Period of
Product Use:
2 years
Paintball
Experience:
More than 5 years
Similar
Products Used:
WERKS 14"
Old spyder barrels ( with adapter )
Marker Setup: Tippmann A-5 with 14" werks, 68ci 4500 psi HP tank, low pressure system (very helpful), E-grip, m16 style stock, remote hose, upgraded internals, scope ( a cheap wal-mart scope mostly for looks but it does help if you use it as a monocular when playing in the woods, although you need to take off your mask)
Recommended
Paintballs:
marbalizer
Strengths: Looks cool
More accurate than stock
Weaknesses: Werks is better...and cheaper
High grade paint required for described preformance
Review: I have to say I was disappionted with my flatline. Although it was more accurate than the stock, it wasnt worth 100 bucks. Also the extra 100 ft it adds to your shot is 100 ft of inaccuracy and if you are shooting at someone that far away you need dead on accuracy.

I also noticed that when i didnt use expensive paint, it broke a lor of balls (more than the stock) and you need gun cleaner or a sink to clean it back to top preformance

i was also pretty ticked when I lost the original barrel adapter because I had to switch it out for the flatline.

I WASNT IMPRESSED WITH IT. IN MY OPINION ITS A WAY TO WASTE YOUR MONEY ON A BAD UPGRADE WHEN YOU CAN GET THE WERKS FOR CHEAPER
Conclusion: Not a recommended buy, get the 14" werks barrel instead
Rating:
4 out of 10
 

Review Comments
dmz boy Wednesday, December 20th, 2006 | 5:30 pm PST
you should give the apex a try much better accuracy at long range but i agree i have noticed the flatlines being horribly inaccurate at long range
   

getbent33 Saturday, March 10th, 2007 | 4:10 pm PST
Dispute:
If you review a gun, or barrel review the gun, or barrel u talk about your 14 werks more than the flatline if u wish 2 review the werks review the werks!
   

cbean Tuesday, May 29th, 2007 | 7:12 am PST
Quote:
If you review a gun, or barrel review the gun, or barrel u talk about your 14 werks more than the flatline if u wish 2 review the werks review the werks!


I believe you meant to write:
If you review a gun or barrel, review that gun or barrel. You talk about your 14" werks more than the flatline. I f you wish to review the werks, review the werks!

If you dispute a review, you should try to spell some of the words correctly. I can happily forgive one or two errors as long as a person is at least trying. Also, he did not mention the Werks barrel at all in the actual Review section, only the Conclusion, and the Similar Products/Marker Setup, where we would expect to see that listed anyways.
   

getbent33 Wednesday, May 30th, 2007 | 8:56 am PST
quote:
Originally posted by cbean
Quote:
If you review a gun, or barrel review the gun, or barrel u talk about your 14 werks more than the flatline if u wish 2 review the werks review the werks!


I believe you meant to write:
If you review a gun or barrel, review that gun or barrel. You talk about your 14" werks more than the flatline. I f you wish to review the werks, review the werks!

If you dispute a review, you should try to spell some of the words correctly. I can happily forgive one or two errors as long as a person is at least trying. Also, he did not mention the Werks barrel at all in the actual Review section, only the Conclusion, and the Similar Products/Marker Setup, where we would expect to see that listed anyways.


LOL there was no spelling mistakes. If U would like 2 talk about my grammar that would B a issue in itself but he does mention the werks in the review and the conclusion. I stand by what ME wrote 100% have a good day ME friend!
Last edited on Wednesday, May 30th, 2007 at 8:57 am PST
   

somemook Saturday, May 9th, 2009 | 9:56 pm PST
Any barrel longer then 12 inches ends up hurting your range as the paintball starts to slow before it has even left your barrel. No real reason to mention that, just felt like sharing.
   

Post a Comment
Please log in to your account to post a comment.

Not a member yet? Sign up now for free!

Return to the Reviews

Help / FAQ  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Advertising Info  |  Link to Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Top

Paintball Review

Copyright © 2000-2014 Hillclimb Media