paintball

  Join pbreview.com  |  Log In  
pbReview.com - Paintball Reviews and Paintball Fields

Search:

  
Home     |      Paintball Articles     |      Paintball Videos     |     Paintball Gear     |     Paintball Fields     |     Paintball Stores     |     Hot Deals     |     Paintball Forums     |     Chat
pbReview.com / Comments on thisisnotatoy's Review / Comments on thisisnotatoy's Review / Comments on thisisnotatoy's Review / Comments on thisisnotatoy's Review

Comments on thisisnotatoy's Review

Jump to the Comments  |  Post a Comment  |  Dispute this Review  |  Return to the Reviews

thisisnotatoy Wednesday, October 31st, 2007
Period of
Product Use:
3 months3 of 3 people found this review helpful.

Paintball
Experience:
1 year
Similar
Products Used:
VL200 - Personally, I like the shape of the Archon Tacamo better. The Archon hopper also feeds a bit quicker
Marker Setup: Tippmann A-5, or 98 Custom Pro A.C.T. w/ the Archon hopper,
48/3000 compressed air,
Tippmann Werks 12" barrel or J&J Ceramic
Strengths: durable plastic, feeds faster than VL200, better looking than (sausage-shaped) VL200, in my opinion
Weaknesses: Nothing other than being limited by gravity
Review: I think that this is one of the best gravity-fed hoppers you can buy. I am skeptical of the manufacturer's claimed 11 bps feed rate, but it does channel the paintballs into two separate "tunnels" away from the other paintballs, which helps it feed a little bit faster than regular gravity fed hoppers, and there is a plastic covering separating the balls in the feed tube from the rest of the paintballs in the hopper (it's kinda hard to describe -- you have to see inside the hopper to know what I'm talking about)....so, this is good for blowback markers.

The hopper is made of plastic, but it seems pretty durable - more so that that of the VL200, for instance.

Also, it's got a nicer design (shape) to it than the VL200
Conclusion: I would recommend this product if you want something different than all of the VL200s you see, and if you want a grav.-fed hopper that feeds a little bit faster. Personally, as I mentioned above, I doubt that it feeds 11.6 bps or whatever the manufacturer claims, but if you have a low-end mechanical gun or just don't want a motorized hopper, then this is a good choice.

Overall, it's great for a gravity-fed hopper - won't get you the bps of a motorized hopper, but good for what it is.
Rating:
10 out of 10
 

Review Comments

No Comments


Post a Comment
Please log in to your account to post a comment.

Not a member yet? Sign up now for free!

Return to the Reviews

Help / FAQ  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Advertising Info  |  Link to Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Top

Paintball Review

Copyright © 2000-2014 Hillclimb Media