paintball

  Join pbreview.com  |  Log In  
pbReview.com - Paintball Reviews and Paintball Fields

Search:

  
Home     |      Paintball Articles     |      Paintball Videos     |     Paintball Gear     |     Paintball Fields     |     Paintball Stores     |     Hot Deals     |     Paintball Forums     |     Chat
pbReview.com / Comments on jjgoforward's Review / Comments on jjgoforward's Review / Comments on jjgoforward's Review / Comments on jjgoforward's Review

Comments on jjgoforward's Review

Jump to the Comments  |  Post a Comment  |  Dispute this Review  |  Return to the Reviews

jjgoforward Thursday, August 7th, 2008
Period of
Product Use:
3 months2 of 2 people found this review helpful.

Paintball
Experience:
2 years
Similar
Products Used:
This is my first HPA tank to own.
I have rented Chromaly Pure Energy 72/3000/ 68/3000 Crossfire Chromaly
Marker Setup: Diablo Reincarnation 2 LCD BBS w/ EYES Black/Silver Fade
Halo Frontman TSA E'hopper
14" J&J Ceramic
Carlton/Crossfire 88/3000 HPA
Strengths: Better consistancy over CO2
Better efficiency over 68/3000 Chromaly
Lighter than 68/3000 Chromaly
Weaknesses: Tank is VERY long.
Not as light as 4000 tanks.
Review: After about a year of frustration with paintballs going everywhere except where I was aiming them, I began to try to figure out an economical way to make the best of what I have. Jeff from Action Center Paintball suggested that I start with switching from CO2 to HPA. However, I didn't see the $175-$250 for most of the high end HPA systems as economical. I found the 88/3000 Crossfire/Carlton at just a little over $100. It is one of the best paintball purchases I have made. The first time I used it, it was obvious that the tradjectory of the paintballs were much more consistant. Also, Chrono-which used to be a beast with CO2, became a piece of cake. My velocity is usually +/-4 fps with the Crossfire/Carlton. It was usually +/-10 with CO2. Still with a 3000 tank I was not sure how often I would need to refill during a good day of paintball. With the combination of the 88 cu Crossfire, and the tank I have been able to play three hours without a refill. In those three hours I went through about 1100 paintballs. This is easily as good as I would do with a 20 oz CO2 tank. With the 68/3000 chromaly rentals I was using I would have to refill two or three times in a three hour afternoon.
The 3000 Carlton tank is a little long, and it is difficult to stretch a tank cover onto it. Also with my marker, it makes it a pretty long reach to the forgrip if the but end of the tank is against the front of your shoulder. I have seen guys put the tank on top of their shoulder. This could be a good remedy, but it is a little uncomfortable to me. If you have deep pockets, a 4000 stubby Crossfire tank would probably be better.
Conclusion: If you are price consious (Jeff at Action Center would say cheap), and you want HPA, this is a great way to go. 88/3000 Crossfire/Carlton. I will give it an 8 because of the extra length, and the extra weight over some of the Crossfire 4000 Stubbies I have examined. However this combination is a great buy.
Rating:
8 out of 10Last edited on Tuesday, December 9th, 2008 at 3:30 pm PST
 

Review Comments
NinjaDragon23 Friday, August 29th, 2008 | 11:44 am PST
"My velocity is usually +/-4 bps". lol i didnt know velocity was measured in balls per second. The crossfire tanks are great, you just got one that was a bit big for you. I think the fiber wrapped ones are much lighter and easier to handle. My bro had a 72/3000 steel PE tank and that was a f-ing giant so i can only imagine what your going through lol. I roll a 45/45 and i like it alot. I get about 900 shots per fill with my PM7.
   

Post a Comment
Please log in to your account to post a comment.

Not a member yet? Sign up now for free!

Return to the Reviews

Help / FAQ  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Advertising Info  |  Link to Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Top

Paintball Review

Copyright © 2000-2014 Hillclimb Media