Join  |  Log In - Paintball Reviews and Paintball Fields


Home     |      Paintball Articles     |      Paintball Videos     |     Paintball Gear     |     Paintball Fields     |     Paintball Stores     |     Hot Deals     |     Paintball Forums     |     Chat / Comments on Ivar Nelson's Review / Comments on Ivar Nelson's Review / Comments on Ivar Nelson's Review / Comments on Ivar Nelson's Review

Comments on Ivar Nelson's Review

Jump to the Comments  |  Post a Comment  |  Dispute this Review  |  Return to the Reviews

Ivar Nelson Wednesday, January 28th, 2004
Period of
Product Use:
Less than a month26 of 29 people found this review helpful.

More than 5 years
Products Used:
Various Gravity Feed Models, Hopper on Tippmann A-5, Ev'Lution II
Marker Setup: Spyder Imagine, ANS delrin bolt, ANS Expansion Chamber and ANS feed neck, SP Teardrop Barrel
Several "Cosmetic" Upgrades
Strengths: Competitively priced, 6 vanes V. Revy's 4 (faster?), Sanding not required, Sound-activated.
Weaknesses: Slower than some more expensive types, (Evo II, Empire Reloader "B" and Halo).
Review: Strengths. This hopper cost me $41.00, plus $6.00 shipping on e-Bay from a well-known Paintball Store. That saved me almost 7 dollars over what it would have cost me locally (with sales tax). If I could have found it! So I saved a little money on the hopper, and got a product that, in my opinion, is better than its main competition, the Revy. I will add an edit later if I find its durability/reliability to be less than expected.
It was a clear model originally, but is now painted a flat black (Zynolyte Speed-E-Namel) which was done in three thin coats that adhere very well to the plastic. I had to scrape off some black paint with my pocketknife over the red power indicator light. That took about one minute.
I also feel this to quite possibly be a better design. It has six vanes instead of the four on the competition, is sound activated, and has been flawless to date at up to the modified Imagine's maximum ROF. Due to the bolt that is probably a little faster than a stock Spyder's 13-14 bps.
A little "common sense" evaluation of potential feed rates seems appropriate. The Egg, Halo, A-5 and Reloader "B" are all "force feeding" models that are faster than this class of hopper, while almost anything is faster than a gravity fed hopper. But I have a strong opinion that the Empire is somewhat faster than what some people say gravity alone limits it to. Why? because there is more than just gravity on a single paintball at work here. There is also the force applied by the overlying paintballs in the hopper. A full plastic 1 gal. milk bottle provides a good example. Poke a hole in the bottle near the water (milk?) line and the fluid barely dribbles out. Poke the same size hole near the bottom, and a stream will be formed that shows the extra force acting on the liquid. Think of paintballs and water molecules as being similar except for size, and you should have the idea.
But, remember that the lower the "water level", the less force pushing down on the contents, be it liquid or paintballs. A near-empty hopper may be slower. Make sense?
Weaknesses. The down-tube is considerably smaller than on the "high-end" hoppers, and will fit into stock feed tubes easily. One caution, some larger diameter after-market necks may not be tight enough, and you may have to shim them for this hopper. I won't mention any names, but the initials are ANS (A good product though). No real problem, I used a cut up foil "sticky" with its own adhesive. Works fine.
If you have an Angel, Timmy, TES, "The One", or any of a number of inherently fast markers, or even one that can be upgraded to around 20 bps, you may sooner or later need something faster to avoid chops or "dry-firing". (This depends on whether or not you have an "eye") But for all but the fastest of the fast, the Empire is a good choice.
Conclusion: If it is appropriate to your marker now, and in the foreseeable future, buy it. Once again I am vacillating on a rating. I would give it a nine, because it is a little slower than some. BUT, if one does a little research on a product before the purchase, they should know the capabilities of it. In that case any problem is probably due to the "nut behind the trigger". That combined with the price advantage of this product gets it into the high nines, rounding off to a ten. Doesn't mean that it is the best, just the best in its class.
10 out of 10Last edited on Sunday, February 1st, 2004 at 8:06 pm PST

Review Comments
xXniTemAreXx Tuesday, March 16th, 2004 | 7:38 am PST
wow, awesome review, that milk thingy makes lots of sense :)

Stanman Thursday, April 15th, 2004 | 1:00 pm PST
GREAT review... i like the whole physic analogy of it all ; ) ...

56kHero Monday, June 14th, 2004 | 10:20 pm PST
Liked your review, went a little brainy on the water/gravity trick.

DyeHardP8ntball Friday, August 6th, 2004 | 11:00 pm PST
very well put

Moose0nTheLoose Saturday, November 6th, 2004 | 3:03 pm PST
nice review man. thx for the science lesson

PiranhaUser Saturday, January 1st, 2005 | 8:26 pm PST
i allready knew that lol, i guess i was a nerd before i was a paintballer (not that your a nerd) i have a reloader and i LOVE that thing.

Quagmire_FamGUY Monday, April 4th, 2005 | 8:23 pm PST
quit trying to act like you know what ur talking bout, nelson.

PiranhaUser Tuesday, April 5th, 2005 | 12:06 pm PST
quit being a jerk Quagmire, i hope yours really does get caught in a window this time!

patrick_11988 Saturday, July 2nd, 2005 | 6:36 pm PST
how do you get it to stay cause my bro has a feed neck attached to his hopper and vert feed so how does that work since this thing has no o rings

Post a Comment
Please log in to your account to post a comment.

Not a member yet? Sign up now for free!

Return to the Reviews

Help / FAQ  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Advertising Info  |  Link to Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use

Paintball Review

Copyright © 2000-2015 Hillclimb Media