PDA

View Full Version : reg or expansion chamber?


Mr. Kitty
02-27-2001, 08:03 PM
I'm plannin on getting a remote. Should I get a reg or an expansion chamber? what is the difference and which one is better?

blinkpk11
02-27-2001, 08:11 PM
get a reg, your remote does the work of an expansion chamber and them some. And with a good reg u can go LP with some other upgrades (valve, bolt, other sh*t u need to go LP, etc.)

antiramie
02-28-2001, 11:26 AM
How much money do you have to spend Kitty?

Dräko
02-28-2001, 12:38 PM
I plan on running a drop forward, not a remote. Should i get an expansion chamber or Regulator. Also do yall know anything about the small screwin to the c02 valve x-chambers?

Mr. Kitty
02-28-2001, 03:07 PM
I just found out my gun already has an expansion chamber but I've heard it's a heavy gun. so I might still run a remote.

Predator2
02-28-2001, 03:21 PM
well if i were you, i would get an antisiphon tube for my tank and then get the reg. the antisiphon would take the place of the x chamber.

A damn fool
02-28-2001, 05:54 PM
the reomtoe will basically be an ex chamber. Get a reg and anti siphon, ull bever get liquid co2 in ur gun. Also u can use it for lp or nitro later on, and u cant use an ex chmaber. Areg will benefit u later on.

TLplus84
02-28-2001, 05:59 PM
well if you're running remote, you don't want anti siphon..cuz your bottle will be verticle, and so your anti siphon will be submerged in the liquid co2, and will draw that up instead of the gaseous Co2, so i think you should go either remote or anti siphon, but both are very good alternatives to x chambers.

Mr. Kitty
03-01-2001, 04:36 PM
I think I'll get a reg. Thanx guys.

Predator2
03-01-2001, 05:31 PM
yeah but don't use the reg w/out a remote or an antisiphon b/c the reg could freeze up.