Which has a higher ROF an Autococker or Automag?

[scott44]

I just wanted to know which could shoot faster because my brother has an autococker and i am getting an automag in a week. we were arguing about it so i guess i'll ask you guys for you opinion.

[Phaelon Veritas]

Well arguably in the past it has been the mag that has had the advantage of ROF and the autococker being the pinacle of precision and refinement and with todays growing market the autococker with a nice trigger job can compare with mags ROF keeping in mind I am speaking my opinion of a mag without reactive trigger. Of course the reactive trigger ads an edge no mere finger could compete with but granted a force 5 autococker (electro pnuematic) has a ROF better than a reative trigger now if you could just get a hopper to feed that fast! All in all both guns can have the exact rate of fire and the autococker has better accuracy if you tend toward the closed bolt better accuracy theory. but if you go with strict proven facts an autococker and mag perform on the same level stock with the exception of somewhat harder maintenance of an autotcocker!

[Cory]

i think mags can shoot faster...the trigger is nicer cause it doesn't work any front pneumatics or anything else...just the bolt. thats why i think mags are better.

[A damn fool]

it all depeneds on how fast u cane move ur finger. It depends on the erson too, an autocoker has a differen trigger then a mag, so it all depends. The autocoker trigger has a diferent trigger then the mag. I perosnllay can shoot faster with a mag, just becuase the i shortstroke the autockers trigger when shooting fast. There isnt too much ofa differenc,e its mostlt on which gun u can shot faster ureslef,