PDA

View Full Version : omen 2.0 compared to previous omens


murcilago
01-01-2006, 02:08 PM
how much better is the omen 2.0 compared to previous omens?

pbrascal37
01-01-2006, 02:58 PM
well the 2.0 is much better than the original one and has is a little more comparable to the 1.5,

it is better, it has a much shorter profile with a much better stock feeneck

it also has a much better board than the 1.0 at least and is a little better than 1.5

the 1.5 cam arms I hear were much better than the 1.0's so I would imagine that the 2.0's are even better

that is about all I know about the differences in the omen beside the 2.0 has a new style body and new colors than the 1.0 and 1.5

jay9465
01-01-2006, 07:34 PM
well the 2.0 is much better than the original one and has is a little more comparable to the 1.5,

it is better, it has a much shorter profile with a much better stock feeneck

it also has a much better board than the 1.0 at least and is a little better than 1.5

the 1.5 cam arms I hear were much better than the 1.0's so I would imagine that the 2.0's are even better

that is about all I know about the differences in the omen beside the 2.0 has a new style body and new colors than the 1.0 and 1.5
The 2.0 has the 1.5 upgrades. Evil originally made the board and arms for the 2.0 but they didn't want to make every body wait so they released them early.The profile is the same. The only differences on the body are the clamping feed the bigger lpc. I think they made the trigger frame bigger?
They also changed the valve and made it easer to set the recock. other than that its about the same as the 1.0:D

OC Assasin
01-01-2006, 07:38 PM
there isnt a clamping feedneck on the 2.0, well at least on my stock Omen 2.0

jay9465
01-01-2006, 07:49 PM
http://images.actionvillage.com/inc/images/large/011-164-0001.jpg?qlt=100&wid=175&cvt=jpg
clamping feed.
http://www.rjskateworks.com/Picture_015.jpg
not the smoke stack like on the 1.0

pbrascal37
01-01-2006, 08:10 PM
The 2.0 has the 1.5 upgrades. Evil originally made the board and arms for the 2.0 but they didn't want to make every body wait so they released them early.The profile is the same. The only differences on the body are the clamping feed the bigger lpc. I think they made the trigger frame bigger?
They also changed the valve and made it easer to set the recock. other than that its about the same as the 1.0:D


oh I am still learning about evil products

OC Assasin
01-04-2006, 07:25 PM
my 2.0 doesnt have a clamping feedneck! its just a low-rise! Should i feel betrayed? or should i feel like a retard for not understanding what we're talking about?

papaintballer15
01-05-2006, 04:44 AM
its a low-rise oring feedneck stock i believe. 1.5 board is in 2.0 which had debounce settings. 1.5 arms are capable to allow force feed loaders to work properly on the gun which 1.0 wouldnt.

OC Assasin
01-07-2006, 05:45 PM
since its been brought up and im pretty new to electronic guns, whats debounce?

papaintballer15
01-08-2006, 09:34 AM
easy way to put it, its a time setting, which is for when the switch can be activated. Example 5,10,20 ms. It also increases some extra shots when shooting, or if switch is activated and then activated repeatedly very fast in the debounce times.

Trying to make this simple but i guess im not thinking simple enough.