PDA

View Full Version : autococker or angel


ippmann
02-18-2002, 07:55 AM
I need to know if I should save my money and get an angel lcd or a dye autococker.

Sked Finger
02-18-2002, 07:57 AM
Cockers are great guns. If you want speed get the Angle. Have you thought about a Genx 3 autococker? They work really good and only cost $600.

ippmann
02-18-2002, 08:04 AM
I'm also looking for better accuracy, not speed

Sked Finger
02-18-2002, 08:07 AM
The Gen-x I have shoots great. This guy that works at a near by pb store. Said Cockers and Angels shoot the same distants and have about the same accuracy. But the Angels shoot for rapidly. Shooting more rapidly means needing to buy more paint.

ippmann
02-18-2002, 08:15 AM
thanks

blinkpk11
02-18-2002, 08:25 AM
if u know how to tune an angel just right, then it would be as accurate as a cocker, but u need to know what u are doing.

Sked Finger
02-18-2002, 09:31 AM
Heres my opinion on Angels. I won't buy one myself with my money. I would love to have one if someone bought me one or a won one.

ippmann
02-18-2002, 09:44 AM
which one is better for a front player
another question: are either automatic

UTLadiesMan
02-18-2002, 09:47 AM
Originally posted by Sked Finger
Heres my opinion on Angels. I won't buy one myself with my money. I would love to have one if someone bought me one or a won one.

Exactly. With an Angel, in two years you have an old Angel. With a cocker, in two years you have a cocker.

elTwitcho
02-18-2002, 09:53 AM
Angels can be just as accurate as a cocker can be, just so long as the first thing you do is to throw that minireg in the trash. 1600 dollars for a new IR3, and it still comes with one of the crappier regs on the market

blinkpk11
02-18-2002, 10:01 AM
lol, or u can be like chris lasoya and throw your whole gun against a fence. (if u dont understand pm me) but seriousely, angels are nice, cockers are nice, it just depends what feels rite to you.

pr0kch0p
02-18-2002, 10:07 AM
Originally posted by ippmann
I need to know if I should save my money and get an angel lcd or a dye autococker.

decide when you have the money. until then dont worry about it. they are both about the same price so you wont be worrying if you have enough. both are about $1100 now, you are gonna need nitro for either, revvy, nice barrel. thats about $1500.

when you got $1500 and have shot both come back and ask again.

Sked Finger
02-18-2002, 10:10 AM
Originally posted by ippmann
which one is better for a front player
another question: are either automatic

They're both good Do you shoot alot or are you a good shot?

Shoe
02-18-2002, 10:14 AM
autocockers are staticticly (sp) more accurate, and have better range. Angels have ok accuracy, but amazing rof pbstar.com has this debate http://pbstar.com/acorvol.html

anchorite
02-18-2002, 10:21 AM
go angel... or cocker....
depends on how you want to play...
me personally, would much rather spend the money for an angel.
if you go cocker.... go highend... like DYE cocker, Freeflow, etc... they shoot beautifully... but so do angels.
I used to shoot a cocker, but switched to electro (matrix) because I had "the need for speed" (yup... pretty corny, but true). if you got the money, want a good compact reliable marker that you dont have to put much time or money (after you buy it that is... lol) into, get the angel. high end cockers are really nice too though.

ohh well... its up to you.

-Owen

AK47
02-18-2002, 10:53 AM
cocker cause angels cost to much also theres no need to shoot alot of paint more paint, more money. one shot, one kill. nice with cockers

ippmann
02-18-2002, 12:32 PM
is a 1999 cocker the same one you find on dyeprecision.com right now because thats the only one I know of