View Full Version : Autococker Vs Angel
Owens
02-27-2002, 02:29 PM
Which is better in your Opinion?
2k1AngelShooter
02-27-2002, 03:14 PM
Well, depends. I Love both, but for a main gun stand point angel, much easier to maintain work on, for a second gun toy gun (like me) Cocker ALL THE WAY!
LordChaos
02-27-2002, 04:36 PM
Originally posted by Owens
Which is better in your Opinion?
It comes down to personal preference.
My preference? Check my sig and see. :D
FrOnTMaN
02-27-2002, 04:49 PM
id say cocker. but if someone offered me either stock, id say angel. cuse it costs more:D
dropkick
02-28-2002, 09:18 AM
Angels are better suited for front/mid players, as the Angel can be made into a very fast and compact setup, whereas the cocker has been traditionally a back mans gun. With the advent of the hinge trigger, however, i've seen many people switch back to cockers (i have been tempted many times :)).
If you have the money, I say get an Angel. There is nothing to them, they shoot great, look great, and will get you all the ladies. :D
mking
02-28-2002, 10:16 AM
Ladies love Cocker,s
I'd say a cocker, if I was offered an angel Id dump the cocker! cost more $$$
anchorite
02-28-2002, 10:58 AM
who cares if it costs more money?
if a cocker performs better, then keep the cocker.
however, that isnt the case.
you get what you pay for.
angel, hands down.
(although SFL cockers are pretty motherfu**ing nice)
angel though.
or, an IR3... which i am buying.
there has to be a reason over 60% of professional players (and amature players) shoot angels.
Silent Knight
02-28-2002, 11:37 AM
peas and carrots!
CoCkErBoY2005
02-28-2002, 11:44 AM
Cockers i think are better than Angels. I would never turn down my cocker for no matter how much a angel costs. I think the autococker is a unique peice of work. My option goes with a cocker. Sorry Angel owners :|
CoCkErBoY2005
02-28-2002, 11:46 AM
This would make a good poll. Someone post a poll option on this thread.
2k1AngelShooter
02-28-2002, 01:41 PM
See I disagree about the price thing. Its hard to compare a stock cocker and stock angel on price, huge difference in price an quality. Id say more of a comparison would be a freeflow w/ hinge and a C&C Angel..or a dark (cobras and adrens are in another league). If your going to compare cockers and angels atleast be talking about equal quality.
A ff (or something equivilent) vs an angel? Hmmm, now thats a hard one.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by anchorite
who cares if it costs more money?
if a cocker performs better, then keep the cocker.
Id dump the cocker, sell the angel, then buy a better cocker.:D
2k1AngelShooter
02-28-2002, 05:29 PM
Ohhh, what I meant was it was unfair to make a decision against one or the other because of price.
And lets compare apples to apples, both better be nice rigs
dropkick
03-01-2002, 09:54 AM
Originally posted by CoCkErBoY2005
I think the autococker is a unique peice of work.
It's "unique" because a senial old man designed it, and decided to make it the most difficult gun to work on, have the most moving parts, and require constant TLC.
magicsly1
03-01-2002, 12:34 PM
I've played with many angels and cockers. Its all in personal preference.
Angels you have accuracy by volume. Great compact guns. Mad rof. Overall great gun.
Cockers you have accuracy. They can still get a high rof but not as fast as angels. But with new electronic cockers then you have the accuracy of cockers with the speed of angels.
do you like your chocolate stired or shaken?
2k1AngelShooter
03-01-2002, 02:31 PM
Originally posted by dropkick
It's "unique" because a senial old man designed it, and decided to make it the most difficult gun to work on, have the most moving parts, and require constant TLC.
Ya there is some truth to that, but hey how many of us could have come up with something like that what, 10 years ago? It's a pretty slick machine when you think about it.
dropkick
03-02-2002, 09:47 AM
Originally posted by 2k1AngelShooter
how many of us could have come up with something like that what, 10 years ago? It's a pretty slick machine when you think about it.
Indeed a sick machine of confusion.
2k1AngelShooter
03-02-2002, 09:54 AM
Man, I know cockers are confusing and such, but why don't you come up with something better?
chinqlinq89
03-02-2002, 10:27 AM
Well, Angels are better cause it electro and has 26 modes of firing. Thats why its better. It cost like $700 more than a regular cocker. If you spent $1200 on a cockerm it would be as good as an Angel. So its not a good comparison.
Omega6_Virus
03-02-2002, 10:52 AM
Originally posted by Silent Knight
peas and carrots!
agreed.
2k1AngelShooter
03-02-2002, 01:02 PM
Originally posted by chinqlinq89
. If you spent $1200 on a cockerm it would be as good as an Angel. So its not a good comparison.
Thats what I was saying.
Peas and Carrots
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.