pbReview.com - Paintball Reviews and Paintball Fields

  Join pbReview.com  |  Log In  
pbReview.com - Paintball Reviews and Paintball Fields

Search:

  
Home     |     Paintball Articles     |     Paintball Videos     |     Paintball Gear     |     Paintball Fields     |     Paintball Stores     |     Hot Deals     |     Paintball Forums     |     Chat
Go Back   Paintball Forums > Specific Marker Forums > JT USA


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2003, 09:18 PM   #1
Ronnie Alarcio
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Question Compressed Air vs C02

I have a JT 3.5
will this gun work better with compressed air or CO2?

I heard that a C02 tank can be upgraded with a anti-syphon attachment. Does a anti-syphon tank work better with a JT 3.5 than a compressed air tank??
Ronnie Alarcio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2003, 08:50 AM   #2
Calebd2
Banned
 
Calebd2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Send a message via AIM to Calebd2
Compressed air would be the best, but if you don't have the cash for that you would be fine with co2 and anti syphon
Calebd2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2003, 04:15 PM   #3
sosoDAF
Team Nostic
 
sosoDAF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: ATL (Atlanta)
Send a message via AIM to sosoDAF
Smile actually,

Normal (not anti siphoned) CO2 will work fine.
__________________
IM ME WITH ANY QUESTIONS, MY SCREEN NAME IS:
sosoDAF
-----------------------------------
Quote:
Originally posted by Calebd2
Good work Soso, you get 4 gold stars!
sosoDAF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2003, 03:44 PM   #4
paintballer42o
These days...
 
paintballer42o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: In Yoh Asakura's house
Send a message via AIM to paintballer42o
Re: actually,

Quote:
Originally posted by sosoDAF
Normal (not anti siphoned) CO2 will work fine.
thats true, but Compressed air is best for it.
__________________
How to get sponsership
BASH THE FREAKS!!!
Current Members
josh_hill, puck_316
spyderman014, tippycustom, chadolf, dcdude, paintballer42o, chunkymonkey, p8ntmaster
Detroit Strange fan #1
InSoMnIac Member #11
PwnzorchreK
paintballer42o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2003, 07:31 PM   #5
Brock
i don't ball anymore.
 
Brock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: california
I do agree, HPA is much better, but on my 5.0 before, i never took in any liquid co2 at all. The expansion and volume chambers work very nicely, but now that i got my reg, im gonna have to get my co2 tank anti-siphoned, or get N2. I think i might order an n2 bottle this weekend, im thinkin PE 88/50. What do you guys think?
Brock is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Help / FAQ  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Advertising Info  |  Link to Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use
Top

Paintball Review

Copyright © 2000-2007 Hillclimb Media