Official SEC discussion thread - Page 54

pantzaroff16 · 08-13-2008, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolffhardt

So only person can be unstoppable?

Hmm..

WTFLOGIC? MORE THEN ONE GOOD PERSON CAN EXIST???

THE HELL!?

I'm sorry you fail at reading comprehension I see. Let me break it down for you and show you how my post illustrated an opinion. I'll even highlight keywords to look for next time.

If anything I'd say Tim Tebow was unstoppable.. since he did win the heisman last time I checked.

WTFLOGIC?

First off, see that blue? Thats the part that, when you were reading, should have set off little alarms in your mind telling you that by me saying "if anything" I don't think anyone is truly unstoppable.

Next you see those 2 big red letters I highlighted there for you? Those should have told you that the author, me, is speaking on personal opinion. Such things are hard to pick up on at first but don't worry you'll get there with practice.

Lastly that orange word is the thing that has been severely lacking in your posts as of late.

I hope this helps you out in the future.

On topic: Who else but the heisman winner would be considered unstoppable if anyone? I mean.. by statistics and a voting panel Tim Tebow was leaps and bounds above the rest.

Wolffhardt · 08-13-2008, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pantzaroff16

I'm sorry you fail at reading comprehension I see. Let me break it down for you and show you how my post illustrated an opinion. I'll even highlight keywords to look for next time.

If anything I'd say Tim Tebow was unstoppable.. since he did win the heisman last time I checked.

WTFLOGIC?

First off, see that blue? Thats the part that, when you were reading, should have set off little alarms in your mind telling you that by me saying "if anything" I don't think anyone is truly unstoppable.

Next you see those 2 big red letters I highlighted there for you? Those should have told you that the author, me, is speaking on personal opinion. Such things are hard to pick up on at first but don't worry you'll get there with practice.

Lastly that orange word is the thing that has been severely lacking in your posts as of late.

I hope this helps you out in the future.

On topic: Who else but the heisman winner would be considered unstoppable if anyone? I mean.. by statistics and a voting panel Tim Tebow was leaps and bounds above the rest.

I just think giving the title "Unstoppable" to one single person.. On the single fact that they won the contest as being unstoppable.

That logic fails on so many levels. I understood your post very well, but seeing as you attacked my "opinion" (Notice all the flashy I's I used).. I felt it was fine to go ahead and try out your end of the stick as well.

And while I see Tebow as unstoppable, it is my OPINION (I'll try caps this time, in case you have trouble catching the itty bitty ones) that he is not alone in that category just because he won the heismann.

Paintballrocks · 08-13-2008, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolffhardt

I just think giving the title "Unstoppable" to one single person.. On the single fact that they won the contest as being unstoppable.

That logic fails on so many levels. I understood your post very well, but seeing as you attacked my "opinion" (Notice all the flashy I's I used).. I felt it was fine to go ahead and try out your end of the stick as well.

And while I see Tebow as unstoppable, it is my OPINION (I'll try caps this time, in case you have trouble catching the itty bitty ones) that he is not alone in that category just because he won the heismann.

well for one, noone is unstoppable. Secondly, would you just get out? Jesus noone in this thread likes you(most of OT pbr for that matter). You dont even make SEC related posts, and if you do its the most retarded things anyone has ever read regarding the SEC.

So I kindly ask, plz stop tainting mah threadz.

coolrazer · 08-13-2008, 03:25 PM

Eric Berry taking snaps at QB...you guys scared yet?

Evil_Wayz · 08-13-2008, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coolrazer

What the Sam hill?

Quote:

Originally Posted by coolrazer

Eric Berry taking snaps at QB...you guys scared yet?

No.

Paintballrocks · 08-14-2008, 02:37 PM

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/previe...van&id=3528771

this makes me a very happy UGA fan.

Wolffhardt · 08-14-2008, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paintballrocks

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/previe...van&id=3528771

this makes me a very happy UGA fan.

It's their game to lose, like the said.. Their schedule is set up to win.

People have high expectations, because there is no good reason they can't get to em.

Paintballrocks · 08-14-2008, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolffhardt

It's their game to lose, like the said.. Their schedule is set up to win.

People have high expectations, because there is no good reason they can't get to em.

Georgia's Schedule is set up to win? Yea, you just proved you have no place in this thread. The biggest thing to mention out of the schedule is that we have LSU then Florida back to back.

Not to mention all SEC teams are a threat. Any team in the SEC has the potential to come out and whoop some tail at anytime. If they dont play hard/smart/ and execute well then any team in this conference can beat them.

coolrazer · 08-14-2008, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolffhardt

It's their game to lose, like the said.. Their schedule is set up to win.

People have high expectations, because there is no good reason they can't get to em.

You. Out. Now.

I should smack you for saying that SEC schedules are "set up to win."

GTFO

pantzaroff16 · 08-14-2008, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolffhardt

It's their game to lose, like the said.. Their schedule is set up to win.

People have high expectations, because there is no good reason they can't get to em.

I'm sorry. What? Either you're a moron or you really suck at sarcasm.

UGA's only reason they can have expectations is because they obliterated Hawaii. They didn't win the SEC last year or the BCS. No offense to Paintballrocks either; he knows they were good, but lost their shot when they didn't win the conference.

South Carolina
ASU
Bama
Tennessee
Off week against vandy
LSU
Florida
Kentucky
Auburn
GT

I really don't see who of the teams I listed that will be a cakewalk besides vandy.

trophyman582 · 08-14-2008, 03:59 PM

I don't have high hopes for my last season as a USC fan.

Paintballrocks · 08-14-2008, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pantzaroff16

I'm sorry. What? Either you're a moron or you really suck at sarcasm.

UGA's only reason they can have expectations is because they obliterated Hawaii. They didn't win the SEC last year or the BCS. No offense to Paintballrocks either; he knows they were good, but lost their shot when they didn't win the conference.

South Carolina
ASU
Bama
Tennessee
Off week against vandy
LSU
Florida
Kentucky
Auburn
GT

I really don't see who of the teams I listed that will be a cakewalk besides vandy.

Only thing I disagree with you on is the Hawaii game. We knew we were gonna stomp a hole in their butt and that was that. What signified to me that we had a running shot this year was

A.) After the Tennessee Game things most def started to look up for the team
B.) We have a good number of starters returning
C.) (the newest reason) Is that if the ESPN article I linked is holding 100% true, then hopefully they arent being cocky and they know that they have the chance to win it all if they work hard for it.

GrimAssasin · 08-14-2008, 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pantzaroff16

South Carolina
ASU
Bama
Tennessee
Off week against vandy
LSU
Florida
Kentucky
Auburn
GT

I really don't see who of the teams I listed that will be a cakewalk besides vandy.

Sweet, you gave Tech SOME credit! Does that mean you love me?

pantzaroff16 · 08-14-2008, 05:17 PM

Of course! I don't think Tech is going to win any championships

but I do actually like GT, and think they are far from a team to just be overlooked.

And paintballrocks, I didn't mean that all those things aren't true. I was just saying that there are no reasons to think that this season will be marginally easier than last with a tough schedule as always with the SEC.

Paintballrocks · 08-14-2008, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pantzaroff16

Of course! I don't think Tech is going to win any championships

but I do actually like GT, and think they are far from a team to just be overlooked.

And paintballrocks, I didn't mean that all those things aren't true. I was just saying that there are no reasons to think that this season will be marginally easier than last with a tough schedule as always with the SEC.

Yea I got ya, I was just saying us killin hawaii wasnt the only reason we think we have a shot

Evil_Wayz · 08-14-2008, 06:16 PM

Search The Internets! I Must Have This Seminole Rap!

Paintballrocks · 08-14-2008, 06:25 PM

Just do a 1988 Seminole Rap search on youtube. Its quite hilarious. I watched it earlier.

Evil_Wayz · 08-14-2008, 06:44 PM

Oh this is EPIC. I'm off to Warchant to piss off some Noles.

Wolffhardt · 08-15-2008, 06:56 AM

Guess no one read the ESPN article posted up a few posts...

Hmph.

Oh well. Back to your blind flaming I suppose.

pantzaroff16 · 08-15-2008, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil_Wayz

Oh this is EPIC. I'm off to Warchant to piss off some Noles.

I wish we had a team within state to hate besides ULL or Tulane. We only hate them because they pull against us in everything.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wolffhardt

Guess no one read the ESPN article posted up a few posts...

Hmph.

Oh well. Back to your blind flaming I suppose.

You really like having egg on your face don't you? Why do you insist on staying in here and cluttering our thread with your bull**** that contributes nothing? Your posts are such a desperate cry for attention when you say things like the quoted post.

Just so you know.. I actually read the article on the 11th or 12th.